Ruling Concerns

You may remember my previous vlog on Feb 25 saying that the FCC issued a ruling with potentially unintended ramifications.

(Click on each line to see the document. They are in no particular order)

Consumer Organizations Application for Review of Declaratory Ruling

Statement of the NAD

Letter from Congress

Sprint Ex Parte

CSDVRS Letter

Convo Petition for Reconsideration

CSDVRS Petition for RuleMaking

SnapVRS Letter

Sorenson Application for Review

Hamilton Request for Clarification

TDI et al Ex Parte

FCC Seeks Affordable Broadband

Purple congratulates the FCC for its release of the National Broadband Plan which seeks to make Broadband more affordable and accessible.

Some of you may remember my comments about H.R. 3101 (the Coat Bill), and Purple’s continuing support of the bill. As Jamie Berke in her blog noted, the FCC “expressed de facto support for HR 3101″ which is a very good thing, indeed.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski noted that only 42% of people with disabilities have adopted Broadband compared with 65% of the general population. This gaps clearly needs to be closed.

NAD Law and Advocacy Center Director, Rosaline Crawford, stated

To the extent that the FCC has acknowledged, publicly, the need for a lot of what is in [H.R. 3101], I think it is incumbent upon us to ensure that the bill passes and to ensure that the FCC has the authority it needs to ensure access to the Internet and broadband for everyone. We are thrilled with this kind of support and acknowledgment of this need.

Other disability groups have lauded the FCC for the Plan’s inclusion of people with disabilities.