Comments on: Why 866 Numbers May Not Work http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/11/why-866-numbers-may-not-work/ Bringing you the people and the users of Purple! Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:44:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Kevin Conkling http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/11/why-866-numbers-may-not-work/comment-page-1/#comment-371 Kevin Conkling Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:47:28 +0000 http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=371#comment-371 Your explaination is very clear and I understand why this 800/866's not working, and I hope that it can be restored soon. Today, many people used to have 800/866 their personal address, and now we need to start w. using local numbers. I hope that FCC works out it back. Thanks! Your explaination is very clear and I understand why this 800/866′s not working, and I hope that it can be restored soon.
Today, many people used to have 800/866 their personal address, and now we need to start w. using local numbers. I hope that FCC works out it back.
Thanks!

]]> By: James http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/11/why-866-numbers-may-not-work/comment-page-1/#comment-350 James Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:27:34 +0000 http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=371#comment-350 Thanks, Kelby, for fixing the link. While I understand Sorenson's ultimate financial motivation I am 100% behind Purple and others' object to the FCC decision to remove 800/866 numbers from the central database which defeats the equalvalent functional philosophy. I commend everybody's efforts to preserve our telecommunication needs and rights. Thanks, Kelby, for fixing the link.

While I understand Sorenson’s ultimate financial motivation I am 100% behind Purple and others’ object to the FCC decision to remove 800/866 numbers from the central database which defeats the equalvalent functional philosophy. I commend everybody’s efforts to preserve our telecommunication needs and rights.

]]>