<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Black Hole of Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/10/fcc-black-hole-of-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/10/fcc-black-hole-of-rules/</link>
	<description>Bringing you the people and the users of Purple!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:44:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digi auto links</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/10/fcc-black-hole-of-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-3652</link>
		<dc:creator>Digi auto links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=287#comment-3652</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Related…...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Related…&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What next?</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/10/fcc-black-hole-of-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>What next?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=287#comment-251</guid>
		<description>I think this explains better what&#039;s going on with the FCC and the so-called black-hole of rules.

http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/2676

To wit, phone networks in rural areas are taking advantage of the fact that calls terminating in their areas give them more $ so they&#039;re setting up free conference call centers others would call into their networks and also setting up pornographic services.  Other networks are replying back by blocking those networks.

Balancing the interests of free speech and preventing unscruplous companies from taking advantage is certainly a problem for the FCC.   I think this analogous situation explains much better what&#039;s going on in the VRS industry where a couple of VRS providers are taking advantage of loopholes to get more money, often through fraudulent means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this explains better what&#8217;s going on with the FCC and the so-called black-hole of rules.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/2676" rel="nofollow">http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/2676</a></p>
<p>To wit, phone networks in rural areas are taking advantage of the fact that calls terminating in their areas give them more $ so they&#8217;re setting up free conference call centers others would call into their networks and also setting up pornographic services.  Other networks are replying back by blocking those networks.</p>
<p>Balancing the interests of free speech and preventing unscruplous companies from taking advantage is certainly a problem for the FCC.   I think this analogous situation explains much better what&#8217;s going on in the VRS industry where a couple of VRS providers are taking advantage of loopholes to get more money, often through fraudulent means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/10/fcc-black-hole-of-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=287#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Thank you for an excellent summary of what the FCC is facing and the problems in trying to regulate two competely different types of technology with very similar service objectives I read the summary as well as the two links. The two links are are over my head, but the summary really was made for &quot;Telephony vs Information Technology for Dummies&quot; like me.Many Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for an excellent summary of what the FCC is facing and the problems in trying to regulate two competely different types of technology with very similar service objectives I read the summary as well as the two links. The two links are are over my head, but the summary really was made for &#8220;Telephony vs Information Technology for Dummies&#8221; like me.Many Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

