<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Deaf People Have Caller ID?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/</link>
	<description>Bringing you the people and the users of Purple!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:44:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasin Bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasin Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Caller ID is important, so I can ingore the telemarketers. So caller id is required. Think, people, you don&#039;t want to get the call telemarketers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caller ID is important, so I can ingore the telemarketers. So caller id is required. Think, people, you don&#8217;t want to get the call telemarketers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kassie</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-258</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree with setting up caller ID!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree with setting up caller ID!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-243</guid>
		<description>The correct Caller ID does not show up when using some of the Web CapTel services.  It can be a real problem because some people will try to call me back using the incorrect Caller ID information instead of using the phone numbers I gave them.  This happened with a dyslexic  friend who couldn&#039;t or didn&#039;t find the time to enter the phone numbers I had given him by email, and it was really annoying that he couldn&#039;t figure out how to call me back.

*All* of the relay services should provide the correct caller id information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The correct Caller ID does not show up when using some of the Web CapTel services.  It can be a real problem because some people will try to call me back using the incorrect Caller ID information instead of using the phone numbers I gave them.  This happened with a dyslexic  friend who couldn&#8217;t or didn&#8217;t find the time to enter the phone numbers I had given him by email, and it was really annoying that he couldn&#8217;t figure out how to call me back.</p>
<p>*All* of the relay services should provide the correct caller id information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-187</guid>
		<description>The company don&#039;t own us. We do whatever we want to do. like for example, we can turn it on or off whenever we want, we can know who is calling from (never know if it is imporant calls). Oh ABSOULTELY!!! we like to have caller ID like other hearing people do. I thought hearing world and deaf/hard of hearing world should have equally but i guess not! They don&#039;t own us, WE can do whatever we want to do like hearing people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company don&#8217;t own us. We do whatever we want to do. like for example, we can turn it on or off whenever we want, we can know who is calling from (never know if it is imporant calls). Oh ABSOULTELY!!! we like to have caller ID like other hearing people do. I thought hearing world and deaf/hard of hearing world should have equally but i guess not! They don&#8217;t own us, WE can do whatever we want to do like hearing people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bartmann-</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bartmann-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-169</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad I found this site...Keep up the good work I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say GREAT blog.  Thanks,

A definite great read...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.dotnetpanel.com/members/Bill-Bartmann.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;-Bill-Bartmann&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad I found this site&#8230;Keep up the good work I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say GREAT blog.  Thanks,</p>
<p>A definite great read&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://forum.dotnetpanel.com/members/Bill-Bartmann.aspx" rel="nofollow">-Bill-Bartmann</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobosic</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobosic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Super post, Need to mark it on Digg
Thank you
Hobosic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super post, Need to mark it on Digg<br />
Thank you<br />
Hobosic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paige</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Well, be my honest, I do not like caller id for safety reason. I grew up on tty with phone with never had any caller id. When the caller id invented, I had them for a while. I hate it. One reason, caller id, caught who was calling, then hang on me for no reason. Tried to call back and won&#039;t pick up. I feel that it was huge hassle if have caller id.  My opinion, when you have the address book on your videophone, you should design your own method to add &quot;who&quot; is calling. For example, my friend&#039;s number. I added her number and her name on my address book. When she called me, her name will show up. Plain as simple.  I never like Caller id. Really.  I have cell phone, and I added their name with cell phone number, and they always showed up because I added this method in address book.  Why we need caller id? I prefer to make these caller to tell me who they are than figure out who did use the phone, playing the game, etc. I dont like Caller id.  I like the way to recieve the number first then find out who this person is calling, then save the number, and the name into the address book. Easier that way, than having caller id. It can lead many false information from caller id.   If you want to set up caller id, then we should have a block number *69 to block it. Why not we have blocker on our videophone, you haven&#039;t designed one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, be my honest, I do not like caller id for safety reason. I grew up on tty with phone with never had any caller id. When the caller id invented, I had them for a while. I hate it. One reason, caller id, caught who was calling, then hang on me for no reason. Tried to call back and won&#8217;t pick up. I feel that it was huge hassle if have caller id.  My opinion, when you have the address book on your videophone, you should design your own method to add &#8220;who&#8221; is calling. For example, my friend&#8217;s number. I added her number and her name on my address book. When she called me, her name will show up. Plain as simple.  I never like Caller id. Really.  I have cell phone, and I added their name with cell phone number, and they always showed up because I added this method in address book.  Why we need caller id? I prefer to make these caller to tell me who they are than figure out who did use the phone, playing the game, etc. I dont like Caller id.  I like the way to recieve the number first then find out who this person is calling, then save the number, and the name into the address book. Easier that way, than having caller id. It can lead many false information from caller id.   If you want to set up caller id, then we should have a block number *69 to block it. Why not we have blocker on our videophone, you haven&#8217;t designed one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Sonnenstrahl</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Sonnenstrahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Of all questions you have raised, this is the silliest of em all by far!
Your question should be aimed at hear people: &quot;Should Caller ID be discontinued?&quot;
If their response is negative, then it should be a MUST for deaf people.
In other words, deaf people get what hear people get and vice versa!
Savvy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all questions you have raised, this is the silliest of em all by far!<br />
Your question should be aimed at hear people: &#8220;Should Caller ID be discontinued?&#8221;<br />
If their response is negative, then it should be a MUST for deaf people.<br />
In other words, deaf people get what hear people get and vice versa!<br />
Savvy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay M.</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I never thought about Caller ID since. Second thought about your mention if this is good for deaf, hard of hearing to use it. Is it benefit for them to aware what this Caller ID important to have ? Does this help identify telemarketing whether know or not this call from?
I linked a webstie and read down to about true Caller ID that use by CRS. Read it. I think its benefit between users and others to PROTECT AND SECURITY. I think this would helps to reduce complaints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought about Caller ID since. Second thought about your mention if this is good for deaf, hard of hearing to use it. Is it benefit for them to aware what this Caller ID important to have ? Does this help identify telemarketing whether know or not this call from?<br />
I linked a webstie and read down to about true Caller ID that use by CRS. Read it. I think its benefit between users and others to PROTECT AND SECURITY. I think this would helps to reduce complaints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty</title>
		<link>http://www.purple.us/blog/2009/08/caller-id/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purple.us/blog/?p=192#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I agree Kelby about ID caller. We are right to have ID caller who call from like hearing callers have ID caller. I am opposed with Sorenson treat us bad as no right!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Kelby about ID caller. We are right to have ID caller who call from like hearing callers have ID caller. I am opposed with Sorenson treat us bad as no right!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

